Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our brand-new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

No one can predict the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With up to date news and links.gtanet.com.br a small but feisty 14 Billion criterion design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unforeseeable. Join us as we attempt to respond to humanity's most difficult questions.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less easy to determine. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has been mining concerns from places like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be better at predicting the future (and have seen some interesting enhancements - research paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world sign up for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is really on the smaller sized side. (Some estimates suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from lots of months ago so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its action. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

Therefore it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the key points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a big football star, annunciogratis.net and she's been encouraging of his career, attending his games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, specifically Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has actually caused some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship private and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the crucial points are the speculation and his evasive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important occasion, the odds and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, possibly around 5%, considering all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% chance

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pushed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it consider that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar efforts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.

Alright, I'm trying to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I also require to consider the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are mindful of the Eagles' "tush-push" method, they might change their defense accordingly, which might either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles use it.

Considering that more than five appears like a considerable number but possible provided their self-confidence, I would estimate a probability around 60-70% opportunity. This accounts for their preparation, confidence in the technique, and the possibility that they'll utilize it numerous times, particularly if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems considerable because it shows he's done it in the past, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, wiki.vifm.info taking a look at more current posts, it points out that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on personal expression. That could indicate he's less likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's likewise involved in a fight with Drake, which may give him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about consisting of any controversial songs in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's .

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations during the halftime program, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold proceed big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which might offer him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his past habits recommends he's not shy about revealing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I also remember reading that Lamar revealed fatigue about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal problems, and the event's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be honest, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And yogaasanas.science who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to trigger offense which he really discovered it funny himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and likes cheeseburgers. There's a short article specifically about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who enjoys consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were plans to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the situation is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't trick the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been forecasting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially financially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and believes anything can occur when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to figure out the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that might influence this forecast.

First, I review the articles provided. They all mention the historic statistics of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has actually shown up more typically than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a big difference.

However, I keep in mind that the result of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, sometimes individuals weigh historical information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I must consider whether this historical predisposition should affect the probability.

After believing about it, I choose that while the historic information reveals a slight preference for tails, it's not statistically significant adequate to move the likelihood away from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the small historical edge exists however doesn't bypass the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% opportunity

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably believe the very same. BUT, its authorities now since our AI states the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a national scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to figure out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a quite serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable hire current games, particularly the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ridiculous." They state there's no proof of methodical predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might mean there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise mentioned that statistical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have been punished more since 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting special treatment, you might expect less penalties, right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero because you can't dismiss every possibility, thatswhathappened.wiki however very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everybody, is it even worth viewing the game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the game turns out before we unleash this upon the stock market. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hi, forum.pinoo.com.tr if it ends up our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.