For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's a fascinating read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and swwwwiki.coresv.net is somewhere between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading innovation reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mysterious, repetitive hallucination in the kind of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are dozens of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, given that pivoting from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can order any additional copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around abusive material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and pleasure".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "customised gag present", and humanlove.stream the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to widen his range, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - selling AI-generated products to human consumers.

It's likewise a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, definitely in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have actually expressed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce similar content based upon it.

"We need to be clear, when we are discussing data here, we in fact imply human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is articles, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song including AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms because it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think the usage of generative AI for innovative functions ought to be prohibited, however I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without consent must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very effective but let's build it fairly and relatively."

OpenAI states Chinese rivals utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: disgaeawiki.info The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually picked to obstruct AI developers from trawling their online content for training functions. Others have chosen to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for example.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize developers' material on the web to help develop their models, unless the rights holders choose out.

Ed Newton Rex describes this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, health care and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and ruining the livelihoods of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, elearnportal.science is likewise strongly against getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a great deal of joy," says the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is undermining among its finest carrying out markets on the unclear guarantee of growth."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made up until we are definitely confident we have a practical plan that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them license their content, access to premium material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library containing public data from a broad range of sources will also be made available to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to boost the security of AI with, among other things, companies in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is stated to want the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the web without their authorization, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training data and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all enough to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It ended up being one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its innovation for a fraction of the rate of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

As for me and a profession as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still need to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has lots of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how quickly the tech is developing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest developments in worldwide innovation, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.