Our brand-new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future but at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to offer it its finest shot. With up to date news and a small however lively 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we try to respond to mankind's toughest concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as two years back, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain lots of pushing questions that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining questions from places like polymarket.com and training a big language design to be much better at anticipating the future (and it-viking.ch have actually seen some intriguing improvements - research paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, bytes-the-dust.com computing eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can provide us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion criterion design which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, its understanding cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have constructed an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we supply the news and watch as the AI reasons its method through unidentified territory to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following concerns to our AI and assessed its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction enhancements from our training, utilize these estimates for prop betting at your own danger.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% chance

And so it seems this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too personal for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the key points from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even invited her friends and household to the Super Bowl, showing her commitment.

Some fans are excited, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump going to the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is a crucial event, the chances and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd estimate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" move, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm attempting to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I require to understand exactly what a "tush-push" is. From the articles, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts uses his leg strength, having done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article discusses that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is quite high. ... I likewise need to consider the protective techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are aware of the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, they may change their defense accordingly, which could either increase or decrease the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number however possible offered their confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% opportunity. This represents their preparation, confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll use it a number of times, especially if it's effective early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime program efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI may not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, however in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his songs, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That seems considerable because it shows he's done it before, so maybe he'll do it again. But wait, taking a look at more recent short articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That might mean he's less likely to resolve Trump this time.

However, he's also associated with a feud with Drake, which might offer him factors to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal issues surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a character assassination match from Drake, so possibly he's mindful about including any controversial songs in the performance. But since he won the Grammys for that track, he may still wish to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a prominent event, Lamar might feel obliged to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to prevent political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material may be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making bold proceed big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which might give him more creative liberty. Plus, his previous habits suggests he's not shy about revealing his viewpoints, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's concentrating on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, current shifts in focus, legal issues, and the event's context-the likelihood seems to be reasonably high, perhaps around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% possibility

Lets be truthful, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the fact that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, saying he didn't indicate to trigger offense which he actually discovered it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which might indicate he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's a short particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who delights in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would engage in a cheeseburger, particularly if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% opportunity

"Tails never fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can occur when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, but there's some historic information that might affect this prediction.

First, I review the short articles provided. They all point out the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It looks like tails has actually shown up regularly than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, lespoetesbizarres.free.fr which is about 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a slight edge, however it's not a big distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the result of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to opportunity. But when making forecasts, sometimes people weigh historical data even if it's not statistically considerable. So, I must consider whether this historical bias should influence the likelihood.

After thinking about it, I choose that while the historic information shows a small choice for tails, it's not statistically considerable sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the minor historic edge exists but does not override the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would probably think the same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI states the possibilities are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will need to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of short articles that discuss conspiracy theories suggesting referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful contact recent video games, especially the AFC National championship. That does seem to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get annoyed when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ludicrous." They say there's no proof of organized predisposition. That's a strong statement from the people in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may indicate there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some fact to it.

Taking a look at the short articles, a number of sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They also mentioned that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For instance, Mike Pereira from FOX said data reveals the Chiefs have actually been penalized more since 2022. That's interesting because if they were getting special treatment, you might anticipate fewer penalties, suvenir51.ru right?

...

So, putting it all together, the probability that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, however very not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth seeing the game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great video game! And hi, if it turns out our AI was incorrect about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.