For Christmas I got a fascinating gift from a good friend - my extremely own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was entirely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it also meanders quite a lot, and forum.altaycoins.com is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It simulates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit repetitive, and very verbose. It might have gone beyond Janet's prompts in collating information about me.

Several sentences start "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a mystical, repetitive in the form of my feline (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on practically every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I got in touch with the primary executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had sold around 150,000 customised books, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr primarily in the US, since pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company utilizes its own AI tools to produce them, based on an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who created it, can purchase any additional copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody developing one in anybody's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around violent material. Each book contains a printed disclaimer mentioning that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and prawattasao.awardspace.info developed "entirely to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright comes from the firm, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is planned as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get sold further.

He wishes to expand asteroidsathome.net his range, generating various categories such as sci-fi, and maybe providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted kind of consumer AI - offering AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have actually revealed alarm about their work being utilized to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We must be clear, when we are speaking about data here, we in fact indicate human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, founder of Fairly Trained, which campaigns for AI firms to respect developers' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's masterpieces. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to discover how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's creator attempting to nominate it for a Grammy award. And although the artists were fake, it was still extremely popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative functions should be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these functions that is trained on individuals's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective but let's build it ethically and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have picked to block AI designers from trawling their online content for training purposes. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has actually partnered with ChatGPT developer OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI designers to utilize developers' content on the internet to help develop their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "madness".

He mentions that AI can make advances in locations like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and destroying the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your home of Lords, is also strongly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, pipewiki.org who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing markets on the vague promise of development."

A government spokesperson stated: "No move will be made up until we are absolutely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to premium product to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for best holders from AI developers."

Under the UK government's new AI strategy, a nationwide data library consisting of public data from a large range of sources will likewise be made offered to AI researchers.

In the US the future of federal rules to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, companies in the sector required to share details of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been repealed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, but he is said to desire the AI sector to face less policy.

This comes as a variety of suits versus AI companies, and particularly versus OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been taken out by everybody from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their material from the internet without their consent, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are therefore exempt. There are a variety of aspects which can make up reasonable use - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it must be spending for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the previous week. It became the most downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it developed its innovation for a portion of the price of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present dominance of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I believe that at the moment, if I really want a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the existing weakness in generative AI tools for asteroidsathome.net bigger tasks. It is complete of inaccuracies and hallucinations, and it can be quite tough to read in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But provided how rapidly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can stay positive that my significantly slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.