For Christmas I got an interesting present from a friend - my very own "best-selling" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has radiant evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic triggers about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and uproarious in parts. But it likewise meanders quite a lot, and is someplace between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It mimics my chatty design of writing, but it's also a bit repeated, and very verbose. It may have exceeded Janet's prompts in looking at data about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading innovation journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the type of my cat (I have no pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I contacted the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he told me he had actually sold around 150,000 customised books, generally in the US, because rotating from compiling AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The firm utilizes its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source big language model.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who produced it, can purchase any more copies.

There is presently no barrier to anybody producing one in anyone's name, including celebs - although Mr Mashiach states there are guardrails around abusive content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, created by AI, and designed "exclusively to bring humour and happiness".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the firm, however Mr Mashiach worries that the item is meant as a "customised gag gift", and the books do not get offered even more.

He intends to expand his range, generating various genres such as sci-fi, and possibly providing an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated products to human clients.

It's also a bit frightening if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to create, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.

Musicians, authors, artists and actors worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then churn out comparable material based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are discussing information here, we actually mean human developers' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is photos. It's works of art. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to learn how to do something and after that do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian singers Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were phony, it was still wildly popular.

"I do not believe making use of generative AI for imaginative purposes must be banned, but I do think that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission ought to be banned," Mr Newton Rex adds. "AI can be really powerful however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese competitors using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and archmageriseswiki.com damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - including the BBC - have actually chosen to block AI designers from trawling their online material for training functions. Others have actually decided to team up - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would permit AI developers to utilize creators' material on the web to help establish their designs, unless the rights holders decide out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is likewise strongly versus eliminating copyright law for AI.

"Creative industries are wealth creators, 2.4 million jobs and a lot of joy," states the Baroness, who is also an advisor to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The federal government is weakening one of its best performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson stated: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a useful strategy that delivers each of our objectives: increased control for best holders to assist them certify their content, access to high-quality material to train leading AI designs in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a nationwide data library consisting of public information from a broad range of sources will likewise be made available to AI .

In the US the future of federal rules to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's go back to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to enhance the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector needed to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.

But this has actually now been rescinded by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to face less guideline.

This comes as a variety of claims versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been secured by everyone from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comedian.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their material from the web without their consent, and used it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "reasonable usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a number of factors which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward definition. But the AI sector is under increasing analysis over how it gathers training data and whether it ought to be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to ponder, Chinese AI company DeepSeek has actually shaken the sector over the past week. It became the many downloaded totally free app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security concerns in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a profession as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for bigger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to check out in parts because it's so verbose.

But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not sure the length of time I can stay confident that my substantially slower human writing and modifying skills, are much better.

Sign up for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant advancements in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the world.

Outside the UK? Sign up here.