Our new Deepseek-based AI says "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be much better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning arrester Labs we are training AI to provide it its best shot. With up to date news and a little but lively 14 Billion parameter model, our AI is boldly anticipating the unpredictable. Join us as we try to respond to mankind's most difficult concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, just as 2 years ago, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain numerous pressing concerns that are less easy to select. Our company, Lightning Rod Labs, has actually been mining concerns from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be much better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some interesting enhancements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, calculating eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can give us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For bio.rogstecnologia.com.br more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion specification model which is actually on the smaller sized side. (Some price quotes suggest ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from many months back so we have actually built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each question we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified area to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We posed the following concerns to our AI and determined its action. While we have seen forecast improvements from our training, use these quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock solid, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta element in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor because 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been helpful of his career, attending his games. They seem to have a strong, drapia.org public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her loved ones to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, particularly given remarks Travis made about Donald Trump attending the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how suitable Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple appears to be keeping their relationship personal and not attending to the speculation straight.

I think the crucial points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the odds and his responses recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd approximate a low possibility, maybe around 5%, thinking about all factors.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% possibility

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a various front-tush being pressed. Will an AI understand what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even understand what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (debate aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI thinks they'll be utilizing Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and wiki.vifm.info lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to determine the possibility that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend just what a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a method where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The article points out that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this method, which is pretty high. ... I likewise need to think about the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs are conscious of the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they might change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a considerable number but possible given their self-confidence, I would approximate a possibility around 60-70% possibility. This represents their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll use it numerous times, especially if it's efficient early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% chance

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or oke.zone any physical symptom, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling back and forth, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to back down from a battle.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of criticizing Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement throughout a previous halftime program when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant because it shows he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more current short articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on individual expression. That might indicate he's less most likely to deal with Trump this time.

However, he's likewise included in a fight with Drake, which may provide him factors to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a libel match from Drake, so possibly he bewares about including any questionable songs in the performance. But considering that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile occasion, Lamar might feel forced to make a declaration. However, the NFL tends to avoid political statements throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such material might be limited or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making strong proceed big phases. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime program, which might provide him more innovative flexibility. Plus, his past behavior suggests he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed fatigue about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That might suggest he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, existing shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the possibility seems to be moderately high, possibly around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the very bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be honest, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the fact that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its prediction? Appears like theres rather of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste triumph, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the posts, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger during a Super Bowl event. Bradshaw later on said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't suggest to cause offense and that he really found it humorous himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the posts, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who delights in consuming, especially with his team. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, especially if the scenario is on screen for an event.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never ever fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be fooled and thinks anything can take place when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, but there's some historic data that may influence this forecast.

First, I review the posts supplied. They all mention the historical stats of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has actually come up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the outcome 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a huge distinction.

However, I keep in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is normally thought about random. The small historic edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, often individuals weigh historical data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I should consider whether this historical predisposition should influence the probability.

After believing about it, I decide that while the historical data shows a minor preference for tails, classifieds.ocala-news.com it's not statistically significant sufficient to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll opt for 0.5 as the possibility, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists however doesn't override the reality that each toss is an independent 50/50 occasion.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you believe the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I assure we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely think the same. BUT, its official now because our AI states the chances are only 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that speak about conspiracy theories suggesting referees are prejudiced towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable hire recent games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to stimulate some uncertainty. I can see why fans might get frustrated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "unbelievable" and "ludicrous." They say there's no evidence of organized predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it may imply there's no real basis or they would have resolved it differently if there was some truth to it.

Taking a look at the articles, numerous sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that analytical analysis doesn't reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For circumstances, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have actually been punished more considering that 2022. That's intriguing since if they were getting unique treatment, you might anticipate less penalties, right?

...

So, putting everything together, the likelihood that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely really low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't eliminate every possibility, however exceptionally not likely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth watching the game still? I guess I'll have to wait and see how the video game ends up before we unleash this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a good video game! And hey, if it turns out our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.