Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl forecasts from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to offer it its best shot. With approximately date news and a little but tough 14 Billion specification design, our AI is boldly forecasting the unpredictable. Join us as we attempt to respond to mankind's most difficult concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is almost upon us and, simply as 2 years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread presently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the stats are well studied, there remain lots of pressing questions that are less simple to pin down. Our company, Lightning arrester Labs, has actually been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a big language model to be better at forecasting the future (and iuridictum.pecina.cz have actually seen some appealing improvements - term paper inbound). Today we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can expect this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world subscribe to my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter model which is in fact on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION parameters and trained using 8000 H100 GPUs. We used 8.) Additionally, its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months earlier so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we provide the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unidentified territory to make its best prediction possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We positioned the following questions to our AI and gauged its action. While we have seen forecast improvements from our training, use these price quotes for prop wagering at your own hazard.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% possibility

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI believes Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposition. Plus got ta aspect in if the Chiefs lose. That would be an uncomfortable proposal ...

First, I'll look at the bottom lines from the short articles. Travis has actually remained in a relationship with Taylor since 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been encouraging of his profession, attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has actually even welcomed her buddies and family to the Super Bowl, revealing her dedication.

Some fans are excited, yewiki.org while others, particularly Swifties, are a bit uncertain, specifically provided comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not resolving the speculation straight.

I think the crucial points are the speculation and his incredibly elusive responses. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an essential event, the chances and his reactions recommend it's more of a possibility instead of a certainty. I 'd approximate a low likelihood, maybe around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from using their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its simply a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's comparable attempts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again throughout this video game.

Alright, I'm trying to find out the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" during the Super Bowl. First, I require to comprehend what precisely a "tush-push" is. From the posts, it appears like it's a strategy where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, uses his legs and lower body strength to push off protectors. It's compared to pushing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that needs strength and strategy.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to carry out the move. The short article mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this technique, which is pretty high. ... I likewise require to think of the protective strategies of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" strategy, yogicentral.science they may adjust their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the variety of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than 5 appears like a significant number but possible provided their confidence, I would estimate a likelihood around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for setiathome.berkeley.edu their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the possibility that they'll utilize it numerous times, specifically if it's efficient early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump during the halftime show efficiency?

AI Final Prediction: 65% opportunity

While our AI might not be like us when it pertains to awareness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was pretty uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it thinks Kendrick isn't going to pull back from a fight.

From the short articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a statement during a previous halftime show when Trump existed in 2018. That seems substantial because it reveals he's done it previously, so possibly he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it discusses that Lamar is moving away from political statements and focusing more on individual expression. That might mean he's less most likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's likewise included in a feud with Drake, which may give him reasons to make some public declarations, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal problems surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation suit from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any questionable tunes in the efficiency. But because he won the Grammys for that track, he might still want to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar may feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to prevent political declarations throughout the halftime program, so there's a threat that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a track record of making vibrant relocations on big stages. He's the very first solo rap act to headline the halftime show, which may offer him more imaginative freedom. Plus, his previous behavior recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public efficiencies.

But I also keep in mind reading that Lamar revealed tiredness about criticizing Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could suggest he's less inspired to raise Trump this time around, specifically if he's focusing on his fight with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past behavior, existing shifts in focus, legal concerns, and the occasion's context-the possibility appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid eat a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid loves cheeseburgers. And who doesn't? Will the reality that our AI has never tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh burger taint its forecast? Appears like theres somewhat of an opportunity that if the chiefs taste victory, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the short articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid eating a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't indicate to trigger offense and that he in fact found it humorous himself. Reid appeared to take it in stride, which may show he's the type to laugh it off rather than getting upset.

Looking at the short articles, it mentions that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and loves cheeseburgers. There's a short article particularly about his love for food, which recommends that he's an individual who delights in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were strategies to celebrate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the circumstance is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% chance

"Tails never fails?" You can't deceive the makers !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have been predicting the coin toss and 53% are forecasting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 very bowls. Potentially profitable? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and believes anything can take place when that coin goes in the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to determine the likelihood that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I know that a coin toss is expected to be 50/50, however there's some historical data that may affect this forecast.

First, I check out the articles offered. They all point out the historic data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It appears like tails has shown up more frequently than heads traditionally. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which has to do with 48%. So, based simply on history, tails has a slight edge, but it's not a huge distinction.

However, I bear in mind that the outcome of a coin toss is usually thought about random. The minor historical edge for tails might be due to possibility. But when making forecasts, in some cases people weigh historic data even if it's not statistically significant. So, I must consider whether this historic predisposition must affect the probability.

After thinking of it, I choose that while the historical data reveals a small preference for tails, it's not statistically substantial adequate to move the likelihood far from 0.5. So, I'll choose 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists but does not bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% possibility

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na help him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training information) I would most likely believe the very same. BUT, its now since our AI says the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still sort of high when it pertains to scams on a nationwide scale). Appears like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, annunciogratis.net so I'm trying to determine the likelihood that the referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty severe allegation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a lot of articles that discuss conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are pointing to some questionable employ current video games, particularly the AFC National championship. That does seem to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get frustrated when their group loses due to what they view as bad officiating.

But then I check out that the NFL Referees Association and wiki.eqoarevival.com the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ludicrous." They say there's no evidence of methodical predisposition. That's a strong declaration from individuals in charge. If they're rejecting it, it might suggest there's no genuine basis or they would have addressed it in a different way if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the authorities are against these claims, and systemcheck-wiki.de some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis does not show any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said data shows the Chiefs have actually been penalized more because 2022. That's intriguing due to the fact that if they were getting unique treatment, you might expect less charges, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to help the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is most likely extremely low. Maybe not zero since you can't rule out every possibility, however incredibly unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the game still? I think I'll have to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great game! And hey, if it ends up our AI was wrong about everything, a minimum of it can gain from this.